A Revolution in the Creation of Scientific Workplaces
In today’s hypercompetitive research environment, successful
organizations know strategic workplace design is no longer a luxury.
Historically, providing a private office and a large wet lab was enough to
attract great talent and achieve the expected results.
However, today’s researchers are challenging the status quo
as they seek creative ways to perform their work. These researchers are looking
for workspaces that enable new levels of collaboration, creativity,
flexibility, and well-being. Convergent scientific workplace design is based on
the widely recognized convergence research model that has been proven to break
down traditional barriers of scientific discovery and pave the way toward
improved recruitment, retention, productivity and innovation.
WHAT IS CONVERGENCE RESEARCH?
Many initiatives are underway to expand awareness and
encourage more scientists to adopt the convergence model of research. The
National Science Foundation (NSF) has identified convergence research as one of
its “10 Big Ideas” for the agency and is creating a solicitation process to
encourage convergence in a subset of its research and center awards. The
National Academies’ Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable and the
National Academy of Sciences have held formal workshops on the topic.
WHY IS WORKPLACE DESIGN IMPORTANT?
In this convergence research model, the scientific workplace
environment is more important. With so many disciplines sharing the same
space—all with different needs and ways of working—and more remote team members
needing means to collaborate, it is important for institutions to understand
the role facility design can play in its success or failure. When we talk about
optimizing the workplace environment, we are ultimately talking about the
researchers within. They are the factors that influence performance,
innovation, and retention—all of which are measures of success for a research
institution.
The cost of unhappy researchers can be devastating. In a
paper titled “Innovation spaces: Workspace planning and innovation in U.S.
university research centers,” researchers Umut Toker and Denis Gray cites that
over a period of 10 years, operating and maintenance costs of an organization
remain around 8 percent, whereas human costs remain around 85-90 percent. It is
much more advantageous for institutions to focus on long-term productivity,
increased collaboration, and reduction of turnover to reduce cost rather than
focusing on the short-term, operational and maintenance of the facility itself.
Sometimes it is seemingly more difficult to demonstrate how
workplace planning can influence innovation in an organization. Toker and
Gray’s study proved this correlation through data analysis that there is a significant relationship between workspace planning, consultations and
innovation process outcomes, citing that “university research centers featuring
overall high configurational accessibility, shorter walking distances and
intact territories exhibit higher face-to-face consultation rates, consultation
network connectivity, and subjective/objective innovation process outcomes.”
Contact us:
+91-8895188931 Social Media: @igrnet | @IgrnetConf
Drop a query: info@igrnet.org
No comments:
Post a Comment
Contact us at info@igrnet.org
+91-8895188931